Add Row 
Add 
Unraveling a Controversial Practice: GM's Alleged Misuse of Driving Data
This week, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin filed a lawsuit against General Motors (GM) and its subsidiary, OnStar, claiming that the car manufacturer has been collecting and selling drivers' information unlawfully. The lawsuit asserts that GM not only gathered location data on users who turned on their vehicle's internet connection but did so without proper consent, violating the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
Griffin argues that GM's actions have serious implications for consumers, as this data has reportedly been sold to third parties—specifically, insurance companies—resulting in increased premiums or even denial of insurance coverage based on a driver's behavior. As outlined in the lawsuit, GM used telematics systems and mobile apps for vehicles like myChevrolet and myGMC to collect driving behavior data without informing drivers that their information would be monetized.
Data Sharing Raises Ethical Concerns in the Auto Industry
This case is part of a growing concern surrounding data privacy in the automotive space. Similar allegations have been made against GM in Texas, where Attorney General Ken Paxton also filed a lawsuit claiming that 1.8 million Texans were affected by this alleged deception. Drivers believed their data collection was intended solely for enhancing vehicle safety and functionality, not for selling to insurers.
Industry experts stress that consumers are rarely informed about the extent to which their driving data can be tracked and used for profit. Mozilla has even referred to modern vehicles as a "privacy nightmare," highlighting the urgency of these discussions. Transparency is key—drivers need to understand that their purchases might come bundled with severe privacy implications.
Potential Financial Repercussions for Consumers
According to Griffin's lawsuit, the data collected by GM included detailed metrics, such as speed, braking patterns, and driving patterns. Insurance companies utilized this data to create driving scores, potentially leading to increased premiums or declinations of coverage based on perceived risk—all without the knowledge of the consumer.
This modern twist on insurance underwriting illustrates a larger trend where insurers might impose rate hikes based on bad driving behavior, with the data being derived from their own vehicles’ monitors, devoid of any acknowledgment from the drivers concerned. As auto insurance continues to rise, many drivers are left feeling betrayed by a system that should be serving them, not penalizing them.
What Consumers Can Do Moving Forward
As the ramifications of these lawsuits unfold, consumers must be proactive. First, understanding vehicle contracts and privacy policies is crucial. Advocates call for clearer communications from car manufacturers and insurers alike about how data is collected, used, and potentially sold. Additionally, drivers may consider opting out of data collection features where possible, ensuring their driving habits remain private.
Ultimately, the conversation around data privacy isn't one to be overlooked. Awareness and understanding can empower consumers to make informed choices about their vehicles and their personal information.
For homeowners and vehicle owners, staying updated on these issues can help prevent unwanted surprises from insurance companies or the auto industry as a whole.
Add Row 
Add 
Write A Comment